From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2017
Case No. CV 14-4874-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 14-4874-FMO (SP)

01-23-2017

MICHAEL ROSS, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written Objections to the Report within the time permitted. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner's Motion to Amend (docket no. 18) is denied, and Judgment will be entered denying the First Amended Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: January 23, 2017

/s/_________

HONORABLE FERNANDO M. OLGUIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Ross v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 23, 2017
Case No. CV 14-4874-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2017)
Case details for

Ross v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL ROSS, Petitioner, v. F. FOULK, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 23, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 14-4874-FMO (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2017)