From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Estate of Van Ornum

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2016
SC: 152222 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 152222

03-08-2016

LINDSAY CLARK ROSS, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. ESTATE OF LEILA M. VAN ORNUM, ESTATE OF EARL NEWELL VAN ORNUM, and ESTATE OF ROBERT VAN ORNUM, Defendants, and MARK D. TOUSIGNANT, Personal Representative of the ESTATE OF VIVIAN ALICE BILLINGS, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff-Appellee.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 319818
Iron CC: 10-004330-CH

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 28, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 8, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Ross v. Estate of Van Ornum

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Mar 8, 2016
SC: 152222 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)
Case details for

Ross v. Estate of Van Ornum

Case Details

Full title:LINDSAY CLARK ROSS, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. ESTATE OF…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

SC: 152222 (Mich. Mar. 8, 2016)