Opinion
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01877-MSK-MEH
10-13-2011
S. JAWN ROSS and S. JAWN ROSS, PC, Plaintiffs, v. JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-5, Defendants.
MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL E. HEGARTY
Courtroom Deputy: Cathy Coomes
FTR - Courtroom A501
William Slamkowski
(No appearance)
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
MOTION HEARING
Court in session: 9:53 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearance of counsel. Discussion regarding the status of the case. Mr. Slamkowski requests leave to serve an additional five (5) subpoenas. ORDERED: For reason stated on the record, Plaintiffs' Combined Motion to 1) Vacate and Reset Scheduling Conference and 2) Motion for Leave to Serve Additional Subpoenas (Doc. 22, filed 10/6/11) is GRANTED.
• The Scheduling Conference is reset for November 17, 2011, at 9:45 a.m. (Counsel for the parties in this case are to hold a pre-scheduling conference meeting and jointly prepare a proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) on or before October 27, 2011. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(d), no discovery shall be submitted until after the pre-scheduling conference meeting, unless otherwise ordered or directed by the Court.Court in recess: 9:58 a.m. (Hearing concluded) Total time in court: 0:05
The parties shall file the proposed Scheduling Order with the Clerk's Office, and in accordance with District of Colorado Electronic Case Filing ("ECF") Procedures V.L., no later than five (5) business days prior to the scheduling conference. The proposed Scheduling Order is also to be submitted in a useable format (i.e., Word or WordPerfect only) by email to Magistrate Judge Hegarty at Hegarty_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov.
The parties shall prepare the proposed Scheduling Order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded from the Standardized Order Forms section of the Court's website, found at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Forms.aspx . All Scheduling Conferences held before a Magistrate Judge utilize the same scheduling order format, regardless of the District Judge assigned to the case.)
• The Court authorizes the issuance of five (5) additional subpoenas, for the purpose of obtaining the identity of the individuals posting allegedly defamatory statements on the internet regarding Plaintiffs.