From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG
Jan 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-60 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-60

01-07-2015

TREVA L. ROSS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendants.


()

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Robert W. Trumble. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rules, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Trumble for submission of a proposed report and a recommendation ("R & R"). Magistrate Judge Trumble filed his R & R on November 5, 2014. ECF 15. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Trumble recommends that this Court dismiss this case with prejudice as untimely filed.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c), this Court is required to make a de novo review of those portions of the magistrate judge's findings to which objection is made. However, the Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and the Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's Order. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984).

Objections to Magistrate Judge Trumble's R & R were due within fourteen (14) days of being served with a copy of the same, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b). The Plaintiff accepted service of the R & R on December 13, 2014. She has not filed objections to the R & R. Accordingly, this Court will review the R & R for clear error.

The R & R was sent to the Plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested. Entering the tracking number for the return receipt on the United States Postal Service's website reveals that the Plaintiff received the R & R on December 13, 2014. A copy of the web page is attached to this Order.

Upon review of the report and recommendation, it is the opinion of this Court that the Report and Recommendation should be, and is, hereby ORDERED ADOPTED. For the reasons more fully stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court ORDERS that the Commissioner's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Accordingly, this Court ORDERS that this matter be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and that it be STRICKEN FROM THE DOCKET OF THIS COURT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record and pro se parties.

DATED: January 7, 2015

/s/_________

GINA M. GROH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Image materials not available for display.


Summaries of

Ross v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG
Jan 7, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-60 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Ross v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:TREVA L. ROSS, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA MARTINSBURG

Date published: Jan 7, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:14-CV-60 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 7, 2015)