From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Opinion

November, 1925.


Order directing plaintiff to serve further amended complaint reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. We think that the amended complaint sufficiently alleges a single contract of employment, and that plaintiff should not, therefore, be required to split up his claim into several distinct and separate causes of action. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ross v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 1, 1925
215 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)
Case details for

Ross v. Blum

Case Details

Full title:ALEXANDER ROSS, Appellant, v. JULIUS BLUM, Trading under the Firm Name…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 1, 1925

Citations

215 App. Div. 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1925)

Citing Cases

Yates v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.

A husband cannot keep his property from his creditors by any mere pretense that the same is the property of…

Hinton v. Saul

"Purity of intent" is not involved in such a case. 27 C.J. 500; 27 C.J. 503; Lachman v. Martin, 139 Ill. 450;…