Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00785-AP
06-20-2012
BRANDI ROSS o/b/o CLAUDIA ROSS, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.
For Plaintiff : Frederick W. Newall #10269, Esq. For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney United States Attorney's Office District of Colorado DEBRA J. MEACHUM Special Assistant United States Attorney Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Newall #10269, Esq.
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
DEBRA J. MEACHUM
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 3/28/11
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office: 3/30/12
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 5/29/12
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
Plaintiff states: Although counsel has undertaken a timely review of the record, the
accuracy and completeness of the Administrative Record cannot be verified until after the
Plaintiff's Opening brief is filed.
Defendant states: To the best of his knowledge, the record is complete.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Plaintiff states: See Plaintiff's statement in paragraph 4, above.
Defendant states: None anticipated.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe this case raises unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
None.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due: 7/27/12
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due: 8/30/12
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 9/14/12
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant's Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY'S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause.
BY THE COURT:
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
________________
Frederick Newall
Attorney for Plaintiff
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
District of Colorado
By: __________________
DEBRA J. MEACHUM
Special Assistant U. S. Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant.