From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross v. Air Farms

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

February 5, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, GUY GILBERT RIBAUDO, J.

Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston ( John J. Martin of counsel), for appellants.

Joseph Tiefenbrun for respondent.


Plaintiff conceded that the safe landing of an aircraft is the sole responsibility of the pilot. Here, plaintiff failed to call anyone to check ground cover conditions at the airport on the day of the accident and neglected to obtain information which was available to him. The Liberty Weather Station recorded and reported approximately 13 inches of snow. The Airman's Guide indicated that the airport was attended in the Summer only. Consequently plaintiff, making the landing on the basis of his own best judgment and plowing into approximately 13 inches of snow was guilty of contributory negligence and was not entitled to recover the damages caused to his aircraft. Therefore the award in favor of plaintiff may not be permitted to stand and the judgment should be reversed.

The judgment should be reversed, with $30 costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Concur — HECHT, J.P., AURELIO and TILZER, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Ross v. Air Farms

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Feb 5, 1959
17 Misc. 2d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Ross v. Air Farms

Case Details

Full title:LEONA ROSS, Plaintiff, and ALAN ROSS, Respondent, v. AIR FARMS, INC., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Feb 5, 1959

Citations

17 Misc. 2d 151 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
183 N.Y.S.2d 938

Citing Cases

Portland Flying Service, Inc. v. Smith

His failure to use the available means of communication with his home base either for permission or…