From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 17, 1995

Appeal from the Court of Claims, NeMoyer, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and application denied. Memorandum: The court erred in granting claimant's application for an additional allowance pursuant to EDPL 701, following entry and payment of the judgment (see, Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Great Bend Aggregates, 181 A.D.2d 998). Claimant's reliance on Scuderi v. State of New York ( 184 A.D.2d 1073) and Hakes v. State of New York ( 184 A.D.2d 1035, affd 81 N.Y.2d 392) is misplaced because timeliness was not at issue in those cases.


Summaries of

Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Mar 17, 1995
213 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Ross Lawn Equipment, Inc. v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROSS LAWN EQUIPMENT, INC., Respondent, v. STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Mar 17, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 1076 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
625 N.Y.S.2d 988

Citing Cases

General Crushed Stone Company v. State

Instead, the only issue here is whether claimant's application for an additional allowance under EDPL 701 was…

General Crushed Stone Company v. State

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The Court of Claims properly denied claimant's…