From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ross-Collins v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2007
No. 07 C 213 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2007)

Opinion

No. 07 C 213.

August 28, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


One paragraph of the just-filed Answer in this diversity-predicated action, based on an asserted slip and fall by plaintiff Leslie Ross-Collins at a Meijer store location, is problematic and requires correction: Answer Count I ¶ 3 presents an unsatisfactory effort to enlist the second sentence of Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(b) to get the benefit of a deemed denial — see App. ¶ 1 to State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Riley, 199 F.R.D. 276, 278 (N.D. Ill. 2001). That paragraph of the Answer is therefore stricken, but leave is granted to file an amendment to the Answer on or before September 7, 2007 curing that defect, failing which the allegations in First Amended Complaint Count I ¶ 3 will be deemed to have been admitted.


Summaries of

Ross-Collins v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division
Aug 28, 2007
No. 07 C 213 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2007)
Case details for

Ross-Collins v. Meijer Stores Limited Partnership

Case Details

Full title:LESLIE ROSS-COLLINS, Plaintiff, v. MEIJER STORES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division

Date published: Aug 28, 2007

Citations

No. 07 C 213 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 28, 2007)