From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosmarin v. Sherpa

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 20, 2019
202 A.3d 683 (Pa. 2019)

Opinion

No. 589 MAL 2018

02-20-2019

Barbara ROSMARIN, Executrix for the Estate of Gene Barclay Rosmarin, Petitioner v. Lakpa Yanji SHERPA, Respondent


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED.


Summaries of

Rosmarin v. Sherpa

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
Feb 20, 2019
202 A.3d 683 (Pa. 2019)
Case details for

Rosmarin v. Sherpa

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA ROSMARIN, EXECUTRIX FOR THE ESTATE OF GENE BARCLAY ROSMARIN…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

Date published: Feb 20, 2019

Citations

202 A.3d 683 (Pa. 2019)