From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosman v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 6, 1967
27 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Opinion

March 6, 1967


Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated November 9, 1966, reversed and motion granted, with $10 costs and disbursements. The method of service of process chosen by plaintiff is not authorized and is therefore invalid (CPLR 313, 311; Business Corporation Law, §§ 307, 306). It further appears that the facts, so far as they appear in this record, would not be sufficient basis for jurisdiction ( Kramer v. Vogl, 17 N.Y.2d 27; Feathers v. McLucas, 15 N.Y.2d 443, 458, 464). Ughetta, Acting P.J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosman v. Clark

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 6, 1967
27 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)
Case details for

Rosman v. Clark

Case Details

Full title:STANLEY ROSMAN, Respondent, v. JAMES CLARK, Doing Business as CLARK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 6, 1967

Citations

27 A.D.2d 839 (N.Y. App. Div. 1967)

Citing Cases

Koepke v. Bilnor Corp.

"Inasmuch as plaintiff did not fully comply with the statutory method of service of process chosen by him,…

Coil Co. v. Weather-Twin Corp.

This was not proper service under section 306 of the Business Corporation Law and since unauthorized by…