. at 183 (finding “because certain key players in this matter- employees of the SSA-did not testify at the administrative hearing and were not deposed at that level or at the district court level, there is a ‘real possibility that [plaintiff] was prejudiced by the denial' of her discovery request” (quoting Ingle v. Yelton, 439 F.3d 191, 195 (4th Cir. 2006)); Rosinbum v. Azar, No. CV TDC-19-3119, 2020 WL 6545853, at *6 (D. Md. Nov. 6, 2020) (holding that “despite the fact that the FDA managers and supervisors central to her case provided affidavits during the administrative investigation, none have been deposed, so Rosinbum has not yet had any opportunity to test the credibility, motivations, or mindsets or key witnesses . . . in an adversarial setting.”).