From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosier v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 1, 2023
No. SC23-22 (Fla. Mar. 1, 2023)

Opinion

SC23-22

03-01-2023

BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER Petitioner(s) v. JULIE L. JONES, ETC. Respondent(s)


Lower Tribunal No(s).: 4D22-873; 472016CA000389CAAXMX

Because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, he is not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

POLSTON, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosier v. Jones

Supreme Court of Florida
Mar 1, 2023
No. SC23-22 (Fla. Mar. 1, 2023)
Case details for

Rosier v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:BELAFONTE LOPEZ ROSIER Petitioner(s) v. JULIE L. JONES, ETC. Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Mar 1, 2023

Citations

No. SC23-22 (Fla. Mar. 1, 2023)