From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosetti v. Weinberger

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1975
525 F.2d 986 (6th Cir. 1975)

Opinion

No. 75-1893.

December 17, 1975.

Irwin W. Barkan, Barkan, Barkan Neff, David Dachner, Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant.

William W. Milligan, U.S. Atty., Thomas D. Thompson, Columbus, Ohio, Robert J. Kielty, Asst. U.S. Atty, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant-appellee.

Before WEICK, PECK and LIVELY, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


This appeal, perfected from an order of the district court affirming the defendant-appellee's denial of social security disability benefits, has been submitted on the record on appeal and on the briefs and oral arguments of the parties. It is concluded that there is substantial evidence in the record to support the appellee's finding that appellant is possessed of the residual physical capacity to perform light work and his finding that such light work is available in the local and national economy, and therefore,

It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.


Summaries of

Rosetti v. Weinberger

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Dec 17, 1975
525 F.2d 986 (6th Cir. 1975)
Case details for

Rosetti v. Weinberger

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT ROSETTI, JR., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CASPAR WEINBERGER, SECRETARY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Dec 17, 1975

Citations

525 F.2d 986 (6th Cir. 1975)