From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosetti v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2001
288 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted October 22, 2001.

November 13, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Colabella, J.), entered July 6, 2000, which granted the motion of the defendant County of Westchester for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Norman M. Block, P.C., Hawthorne, N.Y., for appellant.

Alan D. Scheinkman, County Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Stacey Dolgin-Kmetz and Mary Lynn Nicolas of counsel), for respondent.

Before: CORNELIUS J. O'BRIEN, J.P., WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff was injured when she allegedly slipped and fell on a public sidewalk in the City of Yonkers in front of a building which was leased by the defendant County of Westchester (hereinafter the County). An owner of premises that abut a public sidewalk is not liable to a pedestrian injured as a result of a defect in the sidewalk unless the owner affirmatively caused the defect or negligently constructed or repaired the sidewalk, or caused the defect to occur because of some special use, or unless a statute or ordinance placed an obligation on the owner to maintain the sidewalk and expressly makes the owner liable for injuries occasioned by the failure to perform that duty (see, Hausser v. Giunta, 88 N.Y.2d 449, 452-453; Capobianco v. Mari, 267 A.D.2d 191). Similarly, unless one of the above exceptions has been established, a tenant of premises that abut a public sidewalk is not liable to a pedestrian injured as a result of a defect in the sidewalk (see, Strauss v. Tam Tam, 231 A.D.2d 564, 565).

The County established its entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it as a matter of law. In opposition, the plaintiff failed to present evidence sufficient to raise any triable issues of fact as to the County's liability for her injury (see, Capobianco v. Mari, supra).

O'BRIEN, J.P., FRIEDMANN, SCHMIDT and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosetti v. City of Yonkers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2001
288 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Rosetti v. City of Yonkers

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPHINE ROSETTI, appellant, v. CITY OF YONKERS, ET AL., defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 288 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
732 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

Kline v. City of New York

Injured plaintiff Ruth Kline allegedly sustained personal injuries when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk…

Diaz v. State of New York

Thus, ". . . [a]n abutting landowner may not be held accountable for failure to remove snow or ice from a…