From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roses v. Alamac Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1949
276 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

December 20, 1949.

Present — Peck, P.J., Glennon, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.


The evidence contained in the record before us establishes without question that a guest-innkeeper relationship existed at the time the lost property was delivered to defendant's employees. In fact the complaint is predicated on such a relationship. It is undisputed that at the time the bags were delivered, plaintiff made no declaration of value and obtained no receipt as required by section 201 Gen. Bus. of the General Business Law, although proper notices were posted in her room. As a consequence her recovery is limited by statute to $100. Judgment unanimously modified by reducing the recovery to $100 and, as so modified, affirmed. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Roses v. Alamac Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 20, 1949
276 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Roses v. Alamac Estates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOLORES R.V. ROSES, Respondent, v. ALAMAC ESTATES, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 20, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 840 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Dilkes v. Hotel Sheraton

We think that the Legislature intended to give a broader protection. We so held in previous cases when the…