From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenthal v. Village of Hastings-On-Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)

Opinion

May, 1934.


Order of the City Court of Yonkers denying motion to strike out the further, separate and distinct defense contained in the answer reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Section 282-g High. of the Highway Law, which makes a village liable for the negligence of a person operating a municipally owned vehicle upon the public streets in the discharge of a statutory duty imposed upon the municipality, applies to the operation of a fire truck owned by the village and being operated while in the performance of governmental duties, viz., on the way to a fire in answer to an alarm. ( Snyder v. City of Binghamton, 138 Misc. 259; affd., 233 App. Div. 782; Matter of Evans v. Berry, 262 N.Y. 61, 70, 71.) Young, Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenthal v. Village of Hastings-On-Hudson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 1, 1934
241 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)
Case details for

Rosenthal v. Village of Hastings-On-Hudson

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN ROSENTHAL, Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 1, 1934

Citations

241 App. Div. 890 (N.Y. App. Div. 1934)