Opinion
NUMBER 13-12-00316-CV
10-04-2012
MARC ROSENTHAL AND ROSENTHAL & WATSON, P. C., Appellants, v. JIM SOLIS D/B/A LAW OFFICE OF JIM SOLIS, Appellee.
On Appeal from the 138th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on July 18, 2012. On August 14, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants.
Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file their brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).