From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 19, 1985
464 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. 83-2767.

February 19, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Lewis B. Whitworth, J.

Hall O'Brien and Andrew Hall and Hall S. Vogel, Miami, for appellant.

Robert L. Koeppel, Stanley M. Newmark, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and JORGENSON, JJ.


The findings and recommendations of the master dated March 24, 1983 were not clearly erroneous, nor does it appear that the master misconceived the legal effect of the evidence. Consequently, it was error for the trial court to fail to approve and adopt those recommendations. Frank v. Frank, 75 So.2d 282 (Fla. 1954); Claughton v. Claughton, 347 So.2d 437 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Finding all other points raised on the appeal and cross-appeal to be without merit, we reverse and remand with directions that the trial court adopt the master's March 24, 1983 recommendations in their entirety.

Reversed and remanded.


Summaries of

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 19, 1985
464 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Rosenthal v. Rosenthal

Case Details

Full title:RUTH ROSENTHAL, APPELLANT, v. MARTIN ROSENTHAL, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 19, 1985

Citations

464 So. 2d 594 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

Richmond v. State Title Guar. Co.

A trial court may not reject a general master's findings of fact and conclusions drawn therefrom unless there…

Alpert v. Alpert

final judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (1) the general master properly dealt with…