Rosenthal v. Astrue

Full title: SHANE E. ROSENTHAL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION

Date published: Jul 2, 2012

Case No: 2:12-cv-00131-GGH (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 2:12-cv-00131-GGH

07-02-2012

SHANE E. ROSENTHAL, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Defendant.

ARMAND D. ROTH Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Attorney for the Defendant HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff SHANE E. ROSENTHAL

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

HARVEY P. SACKETT (72488)
SACKETT
AND ASSOCIATES
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP
Attorney for Plaintiff /jgl

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff shall have a first extension of time of (30) days up through and including Monday, August 6, 2012 in which to e-file his Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant's response will be due September 5, 2012. This extension is necessitated by the number of cases the firm presently has pending before this and other district courts that require briefing.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

_____________

ARMAND D. ROTH

Special Assistant U.S. Attorney

Social Security Administration

Attorney for the Defendant

_____________

HARVEY P. SACKETT

Attorney for Plaintiff

SHANE E. ROSENTHAL
IT IS SO ORDERED.

_____________

HON. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge