From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 17, 1969
250 A.2d 747 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued March 5, 1969 —

Decided March 17, 1969.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Edwin H. Stern argued the cause for appellant, Feist Feist ( Messrs. Hellring, Lindeman Landau, attorneys).

Mr. Joel Sondak argued the cause for appellant Lawrence H. Rosenthal ( Messrs. Okin, Okin Sondak, attorneys; Messrs. Schechner Targan, of counsel).

Mr. William L. Dill, Jr., argued the cause for respondent General Dynamics Corp. ( Messrs. Stryker, Tams Dill, attorneys; Mr. W. Hunt Dumont, of counsel).

Mr. Richard R. Hellstern argued the cause for respondent Art Metal. Inc. ( Messrs. Lowenstein, Sandler, Brochin Kohl, attorneys; Mr. Murry D. Brochin and Mr. Richard R. Hellstern, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 101 N.J. Super. 156.

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 17, 1969
250 A.2d 747 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE H. ROSENTHAL, INDIVIDUALLY AND t/a INDUSTRIAL REALTY AND FEIST…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 17, 1969

Citations

250 A.2d 747 (N.J. 1969)
250 A.2d 747

Citing Cases

Markeim-Chalmers v. Masco Corp.

This question must be answered in the negative."). See also Rosenthal v. Art Metal, Inc., 95 N.J. Super. 8,…

Collins Tuttle v. Colgate Co.

In construing New York's congruent legislation, our Court of Appeals has looked to the reality and not to the…