From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jan 21, 1971
65 Misc. 2d 467 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971)

Opinion

January 21, 1971

Joseph D. Stim for Salvo Realty Corp. and another, defendants.

Kanter, Blodnick Haber for plaintiff.

Garfunkel Hyde for Roosevelt Savings Bank of the City of New York, defendant.

Leonard Mancusi for Bonwit Teller, defendant.

MOTION to dismiss complaint. (See, also, 65 Misc.2d 245 and 65 Misc.2d 320.)


Motion by defendants Salvo Realty Corp. and Midas Collections, Inc., to dismiss the complaint, is granted.

Section 489 Jud. of the Judiciary Law does not make illegal an assignment of a mortgage which has already been foreclosed by the original holder of the mortgage; nor does it make illegal an assignment of the judgment; nor does it make illegal an assignment of a mortgage and its note then in foreclosure to a corporation intending to continue the foreclosure.


Summaries of

Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County
Jan 21, 1971
65 Misc. 2d 467 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971)
Case details for

Rosenkrantz v. Salvo Realty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN ROSENKRANTZ, Plaintiff, v. SALVO REALTY CORP. et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County

Date published: Jan 21, 1971

Citations

65 Misc. 2d 467 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1971)
317 N.Y.S.2d 809

Citing Cases

Roslyn Savings Bank v. Jones

This interpretation of the companion statute to section 489 was recently relied upon in regard to the latter…

First Nat. Bk. of Bay Shore v. Felder

The fact that the Bank's assignee buys judgments in the regular course of business, as a collection agency,…