Opinion
January 10, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.).
The trial court was within its discretion in declining to increase the amount of the award by the addition of interest. There is, similarly, no basis upon which to disturb the court's finding that the stock options and warrants in question were acquired during the marriage and are, thus, marital property, particularly since this Court came to a similar conclusion (Rosenkrantz v. Rosenkrantz, 184 A.D.2d 478, 480).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining argument regarding the award to defendant of a 50% share of such property and find it to be without merit.
Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman, Ross and Williams, JJ.