From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenfield & Co. v. Trachtenberg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
21 Civ. 3858 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)

Opinion

21 Civ. 3858 (VM)

12-16-2021

ROSENFIELD & COMPANY, PLLC, Plaintiff, v. TRACHTENBERG, RODES, & FRIEDBERG, et al., Defendants. STAR AUTO SALES OF BAYSIDE, INC (d/b/a STAR TOYOTA OF BAYSIDE), et al Third-Party Plaintiff, v. BARRY J. FRIEDBERG and LEONARD A. RODES, Third-Party Defendants.


ORDER

VICTOR MARRERO, United States District Judge.

The Court received a letter from Third-Party Plaintiff responding to and opposing Defendants' and Third-Party Defendants' pre-motion letter regarding a potential motion to dismiss. The Court did not receive a copy of the Defendants' and Third-Party Defendants' premotion letter.

The parties are hereby ordered to resubmit any pre-motion letters and letters in opposition such that all letters are in compliance with this Court's Individual Rules of Practice, including page limits and the submission of a courtesy copy to the Court. Submissions must also comply with Judge Marrero's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, available at the Court's website.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rosenfield & Co. v. Trachtenberg

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 16, 2021
21 Civ. 3858 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)
Case details for

Rosenfield & Co. v. Trachtenberg

Case Details

Full title:ROSENFIELD & COMPANY, PLLC, Plaintiff, v. TRACHTENBERG, RODES, …

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 16, 2021

Citations

21 Civ. 3858 (VM) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2021)