From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosendiz-Campos v. Alberto Diaz Painting, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Aug 1, 2011
Civil No. 09-6158-TC (D. Or. Aug. 1, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 09-6158-TC

08-01-2011

SERGIO ANTONIO ROSENDIZ-CAMPOS; NOE DIAZ-SAMBRANO, Plaintiffs, v. ALBERTO DIAZ PAINTING, Inc., FAMILY HOMEBUILDERS, INC, BENJAMIN PLUMMER; ROBERT PLUMMER, Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Thomas M Coffin has filed his Findings and Recommendation on June 10, 2011, The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.

Accordingly, I ADOPT Judge Coffins Findings and Recommendation. This action is dismissed for want of prosecution.

United StatesDistrict Judge


Summaries of

Rosendiz-Campos v. Alberto Diaz Painting, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE
Aug 1, 2011
Civil No. 09-6158-TC (D. Or. Aug. 1, 2011)
Case details for

Rosendiz-Campos v. Alberto Diaz Painting, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:SERGIO ANTONIO ROSENDIZ-CAMPOS; NOE DIAZ-SAMBRANO, Plaintiffs, v. ALBERTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE

Date published: Aug 1, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 09-6158-TC (D. Or. Aug. 1, 2011)