From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenburg v. Angiuli Buick, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 23, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Cusick, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion for summary judgment is denied.

The plaintiff Howard Rosenburg was injured when he slipped and fell in front of premises located at 201 Bay Street, Staten Island. These premises were owned and operated by the defendant, Angiuli Buick, Inc. For his injuries, Mr. Rosenburg received workers' compensation benefits provided by his employer, Angiuli Dodge, Inc., whose principal place of business was also located at 201 Bay Street. Sam Angiuli was the owner, president, and sole shareholder of the defendant and Angiuli Dodge, Inc.

The plaintiffs commenced this personal injury action against the defendant and the defendant moved for summary judgment alleging that recovery under the Workers' Compensation Law was the plaintiffs' exclusive remedy. The court granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint and held that "the mere fact that title to the premises is held in the name of a corporation different from that of the corporate employer should not expose that corporation to suit by the [injured] plaintiff where the owner, president, and sole stock holder of both corporations is the same person". We disagree and now reverse.

The record establishes that the injured plaintiff was employed solely by Angiuli Dodge, Inc., and that the defendant was a separate legal entity from Angiuli Dodge, Inc. Accordingly, the defendant is not shielded from tort liability (see, Casas v. 559 Warren St. Realty Corp., 211 A.D.2d 742; Kaplan v. Bayley Seton Hosp., 201 A.D.2d 461; Bernardo v. Melville Indus. Assocs., 148 A.D.2d 486; Bruno v. Dynamic Enters., 132 A.D.2d 964; but see, Di Rie v. Automotive Realty Corp., 199 A.D.2d 98 ). Mangano, P.J., Miller, Santucci and Hart, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenburg v. Angiuli Buick, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 23, 1995
220 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Rosenburg v. Angiuli Buick, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD ROSENBURG et al., Appellants, v. ANGIULI BUICK, INC., Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 23, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 658

Citing Cases

Samuel v. Fourth Avenue Assoc

hich employs the plaintiff ( see Cappella v Suresky at Hatfield Lane, LLC, 55 AD3d 522, 522-523; Hageman v B…

Salinas v. 64 Jefferson Apartments, LLC

Gil Bergman explained in an affidavit submitted in support of the defendant's motion that he and his wife…