From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblum v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Nov 20, 1951
55 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1951)

Opinion

November 20, 1951.

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Ben C. Willard, J.

Roberts, Holland Strickland, Miami, for appellant.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen., and Phillip Goldman, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


The appellant, David Rosenblum, was informed against, tried and convicted in the Criminal Court of Record of Dade County, Florida, for the crime of operating a gambling house contrary to Section 849.01, F.S.A. He perfected an appeal from the judgment of conviction to this Court and here contends that the evidence adduced against him by the State of Florida in support of the material allegations of the information is legally insufficient to warrant or support the conviction.

We have examined the evidence and have reached the conclusion that the evidence so adduced was legally insufficient to sustain the judgment entered below and it now becomes the duty of this Court, as a matter of law, to reverse the judgment or conviction challenged on this appeal. See Creash v. State, 131 Fla. 111, 179 So. 149.

Reversed.

SEBRING, C.J., TERRELL, J., and LEWIS, Associate Justice, concur.


Summaries of

Rosenblum v. State

Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B
Nov 20, 1951
55 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1951)
Case details for

Rosenblum v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROSENBLUM v. STATE

Court:Supreme Court of Florida, Special Division B

Date published: Nov 20, 1951

Citations

55 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 1951)

Citing Cases

Wincor v. State

Therefore, we are required to reverse these convictions and discharge the appellant. Moore v. State, 152 Fla.…

Gilday v. State

Therefore, the record failing to contain sufficient evidence to support the conviction of the appellant…