From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
No. CV 1-08-0448-SMM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)

Opinion

No. CV 1-08-0448-SMM.

November 22, 2010


ORDER


Before the Court is Plaintiff's Request for Extension of Time to File Reply to[] Opposition of Scheduling Order Modification (Doc. 64). Plaintiff requests a thirty (30) day extension, until December 19, 2010, to file his Reply. (Doc. 64.) Plaintiff states that he was recently transferred from Kern Valley State Prison to the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi. (Doc. 64.) Plaintiff admitted that he failed to file a change of address with the Court but that he anticipates an imminent transfer back to Kern Valley State Prison. (Doc. 64.) Plaintiff stated that because of his transfer and failure to file a change of address he has not reviewed Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order (Doc. 63). (Doc. 64.) The Court will grant Plaintiff the requested additional time to review Defendants' Response (Doc. 63).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED GRANTING Plaintiff's Request for Extension of Time to File Reply to[] Opposition of Scheduling Order Modification (Doc. 64). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Reply no later than December 19, 2010.

DATED this 22nd day of November, 2010.


Summaries of

Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff

United States District Court, E.D. California
Nov 22, 2010
No. CV 1-08-0448-SMM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)
Case details for

Rosenblum v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff

Case Details

Full title:Phillip Rosenblum, Plaintiff, v. Mule Creek State Prison Medical Staff, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Nov 22, 2010

Citations

No. CV 1-08-0448-SMM (E.D. Cal. Nov. 22, 2010)