From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblum v. Cherner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 12, 1966
219 A.2d 491 (D.C. 1966)

Opinion

No. 3847.

Submitted April 11, 1966.

Decided May 12, 1966.

APPEAL FROM DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF GENERAL SESSIONS, AUSTIN L. FICKLING, J.

Cyril S. Lawrence and Myer Koonin, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

Joel Rosenstein and Seymour Korn, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before HOOD, Chief Judge, and QUINN and MYERS, Associate Judges.


This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, now appellee, rescinding a contract for breach of warranty.

The arguments in support of this appeal deal generally with issues of fact. The record shows that appellant, a dentist, contracted to make two sets of dentures for appellee and was paid $550. Appellee testified, and her testimony was corroborated in the main by appellant, that when she placed the order appellant assured her that he would "please her to her personal satisfaction"; that the dentures proved most unsatisfactory; that after returning for adjustments many times, she tendered the return of the dentures; and that appellant refused to accept them and ordered her from his office. On the basis of the evidence the court found for appellee.

Our examination of the transcript shows that there was ample proof to support the trial court's finding. We have said time and again that we have no right or power to retry factual issues and therefore the judgment must be

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rosenblum v. Cherner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals
May 12, 1966
219 A.2d 491 (D.C. 1966)
Case details for

Rosenblum v. Cherner

Case Details

Full title:Dr. Alex ROSENBLUM, Appellant, v. Betty CHERNER, Appellee

Court:District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Date published: May 12, 1966

Citations

219 A.2d 491 (D.C. 1966)

Citing Cases

Scarzella v. Saxon

] Similarly, in Rosenblum v. Cherner, D.C.App., 219 A.2d 491 (1966), we held that a dentist who assured his…

Oliver v. United Mortgage Company

We find no error in this finding as a matter of law; and, as a finding of fact, we are without power to…