From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenbloom v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

October 26, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lerner, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the defendants' motions are granted, and the complaint and all cross claims are dismissed.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries she sustained when, on the morning of January 12, 1994, she slipped and fell on ice on a dirt pathway that transected a grassy island near the Bayside Long Island Rail Road station in Queens. The dirt pathway on which the plaintiff fell was not a public walkway, but rather had been created by the habitual traffic of pedestrians hastening to and from their commuter trains.

The defendants established that the portion of the grassy island on which the plaintiff fell was owned entirely by the defendant Long Island Rail Road. Accordingly, the defendant City of New York is entitled to summary judgment, since it did not own, occupy, control, or make any special use of the land on which the plaintiff fell ( see, e.g., Elbert v. J.F.V. Enter. Co., 234 A.D.2d 413; Minott v. City of New York, 230 A.D.2d 719; Turrisi v. Ponderosa, Inc., 179 A.D.2d 956, 957-958; Balsam v. Delma Eng'g Corp., 139 A.D.2d 292, 296-297).

The defendant Long Island Rail Road is also entitled to summary judgment, as it had no duty to clear snow and ice from an unpaved area that was not intended to be a public walkway, particularly when nearby sidewalks provided an adequate means of access to and from the railroad station ( see, e.g., Garcia v. New York City Hous. Auth., 234 A.D.2d 102; Palmer v. Prescott, 208 A.D.2d 1065; Bacon v. Mussaw, 167 A.D.2d 741).

O'Brien, J. P., Thompson, Sullivan and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenbloom v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 26, 1998
254 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Rosenbloom v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ESTELLE ROSENBLOOM, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 26, 1998

Citations

254 A.D.2d 474 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
680 N.Y.S.2d 262

Citing Cases

RIFF v. STATEN ISLAND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

The burden therefore shifts to the plaintiff to raise a triable issue of fact. See. Rosenbloom v. City of New…

Wesolowski v. Wesolowski

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendant…