From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenblatt v. City of Millbrae

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2011
No. C11-01891 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)

Opinion

No. C11-01891 EMC

11-30-2011

REBECCA ROSENBLATT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MILLBRAE, and DOES 1 -50, inclusive, Defendant.

By: MICHAEL A. MCGILL DALE G. NOWICKI RUSSELL M. PERRY Attorneys for Plaintiff REBECCA ROSENBLATT HANSON BRIDGETT LLP By: M. D. MOYE Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF MILLBRAE


HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

MIKE D. MOYE - 152871

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF MILLBRAE

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Plaintiff REBECCA ROSENBLATT (hereinafter "Plaintiff"), through her attorneys of record, Lackie, Dammeier & McGill, APC and Defendant CITY OF MILLBRAE (hereinafter "Defendant"), through its attorneys of record, Hanson Bridgett LLP, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate and agree to dismiss the above-referenced matter in its entirety and with prejudice. The matter has been settled. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

LACKIE, DAMMEIER & MCGILL, APC

By: MICHAEL A. MCGILL

DALE G. NOWICKI

RUSSELL M. PERRY

Attorneys for Plaintiff

REBECCA ROSENBLATT

HANSON BRIDGETT LLP

By: M. D. MOYE

Attorneys for Defendant

CITY OF MILLBRAE

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Judge Edward M. Chen


Summaries of

Rosenblatt v. City of Millbrae

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 30, 2011
No. C11-01891 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)
Case details for

Rosenblatt v. City of Millbrae

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA ROSENBLATT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MILLBRAE, and DOES 1 -50…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 30, 2011

Citations

No. C11-01891 EMC (N.D. Cal. Nov. 30, 2011)