Rosenberg v. Maryland Casualty Company

Full title: NATHAN ROSENBERG, APPELLANT, v. MARYLAND CASUALTY COMPANY, RESPONDENT

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

132 A. 923 (N.J. 1926)

102 N.J.L. 724

Opinion

Argued February 4, 1926 —

Decided April 1, 1926.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 3 N.J. Mis. R. 1132.

For the appellant, Kalisch Kalisch.

For the respondent, Frank G. Turner.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.