From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Opinion

April 15, 1946.


Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment in favor of the defendant, dismissing the complaint at the close of the entire case. Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Plaintiff, a monthly tenant, was injured when a fire occurred in the kitchen of her apartment, located in a building owned by the defendant. Concededly, the building was not within the purview of the Multiple Dwelling Law and the rights of the parties are governed by common-law principles. There was evidence that the fire was caused by defective wires in the electric light fixture in the kitchen; that the defective condition had existed for some time prior to the occurrence, to the defendant's knowledge; and that the defendant had made repairs to the fixture before the fire. Proof of repairs was some evidence that there had been a reservation of a degree of control of the premises by the defendant as landlord, and the record presented questions of fact which required submission to the jury. ( Scudero v. Campbell, 288 N.Y. 328; Antonsen v. Bay Ridge Savings Bank, 292 N.Y. 143.) Lewis, P.J., Johnston, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 15, 1946
270 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Kings County Savings Bank

Case Details

Full title:ANNA ROSENBERG, Appellant, v. KINGS COUNTY SAVINGS BANK, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 15, 1946

Citations

270 App. Div. 904 (N.Y. App. Div. 1946)

Citing Cases

Reische v. Montgomery

It was error to dismiss the complaint, as the proof of repairs created an issue of fact as to whether there…

Miller v. Morse

In fact, repairs made prior to the accident bear more directly upon the question of whether the landlord was…