From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse and grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict was against the weight of the credible testimony, including the documentary records and the formal proofs of loss filed with defendant by the plaintiffs.


Plaintiffs as beneficiaries under a policy of accident insurance issued by defendant to Ignatz Rosenberg, the husband of plaintiff, Wilma Rosenberg, brought this action to recover $5,000, the amount of the policy, claiming that the insured received bodily injuries caused solely and exclusively by external, violent and accidental means, which were the direct and proximate cause of the death of the insured. Judgment entered on a verdict in favor of plaintiffs, after trial at Trial Term, affirmed, with costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Commercial Travelers Mut. Acc. Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:WILMA ROSENBERG and Others, Respondents, v. THE COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 714 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)