From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenberg v. Bridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

April 26, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, McGowan, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Doerr, Denman, Pine and Lawton, JJ.


Order insofar as appealed from unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Plaintiff's motion to compel disclosure, insofar as it sought the results and conclusions of an investigation conducted by defense counsel, should have been denied. Supreme Court's order, which precluded defendant from offering the testimony of any of its employees concerning the results or conclusions of their investigation, went far beyond the relief sought by plaintiff.


Summaries of

Rosenberg v. Bridge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 26, 1991
172 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Rosenberg v. Bridge

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN ROSENBERG, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 26, 1991

Citations

172 A.D.2d 1049 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)