Rosenberg v. Block

Full title: ALBERT L. ROSENBERG, Respondent, v . MEYER BLOCK and Another, Appellants

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1920

113 Misc. 523 (N.Y. App. Term 1920)

185 N.Y.S. 78

Opinion

November Term. Filed December, 1920.

Charles J. Steinberg, for appellants.

Robert H. Charlton, for respondent.

WHITAKER, J.

An order of the Municipal Court denying the right of the defendants to file an answer was reversed by this court with ten dollars costs to the defendant in this action. The answer was filed and the plaintiff noticed the case for trial. When the case was called the defendants objected to the plaintiff's proceeding until the costs above mentioned were paid, it being conceded that they had not been paid.

The learned justice ruled that the defendants having retained the notice of trial had thereby waived any stay for non-payment of costs, and thereupon an inquest was taken.

Upon a motion to open the default and vacate the judgment, these facts were undisputed and the motion was denied. It should have been granted. Section 125 of the Municipal Court Code provides that, "All proceedings on the part of the party against whom judgment has been rendered, or who is required to pay the costs of any motion * * * are stayed without further direction of the court." This section is substantially like section 779 of the Code of Civil Procedure except that the latter section provides that a stay for non-payment of costs becomes operative, if no time is mentioned in the order, within ten days after service of a copy of the order. Service of a copy of the order is dispensed with by the Municipal Court Code provision, and upon the entry of the order or judgment of reversal by this court the plaintiff was automatically stayed until the costs were paid. Proboner v. Miller, 161 N.Y.S. 306; Rosenberg v. Abraham, 97 Misc. 425.

The plaintiff could make no effective onward movement in the action in the absence of such payment. Thompson v. McLaughlin, 132 A.D. 948.

Service of a notice of trial was in violation of the stay and whether or not the defendants retained or returned it was immaterial.

Judgment vacated, order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and new trial ordered.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs.