Opinion
Case No. 1:06-cv-352.
June 13, 2007
OPINION and ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Stay (DE# 113) filed by Defendants Chad Seybold and Laura Seybold, and the Motion for Stay (DE# 114) filed by Seytron, LLC, each filed on May 24, 2007. No objections have been filed to the motions.
In each of the Motions, the Defendants show that they have filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Indiana, a Petition for Relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and thus are entitled to an automatic stay against the continuation of this judicial proceeding under 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). No one has suggested that there are any "unusual circumstances" here that would justify extending the stay to the other defendants. See, e.g., Parry v. Mohawk Motors of Mich., Inc., 236 F.3d 299, 314-315 (6th Cir. 2000).
Consequently, the Motion for Stay filed by Chad Seybold and Laura Seybold, and the Motion for Stay filed by Seytron, LLC, are hereby GRANTED, and all further proceedings against these Defendants in this case are hereby STAYED until further order.
SO ORDERED.