From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosenbalm v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
No. C 10-0071 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-0071 RS (PR)

10-11-2011

VINCENT LEE ROSENBALM, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD FOULK, Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO EFFECTUATE PROPER SERVICE

This is a civil rights action filed by a pro se former state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges claims against a single defendant, Edward Foulk, formerly the Executive Director at Napa State Hospital. The complaint remains unserved. Plaintiff's last attempt to serve the complaint was insufficient as he attempted to serve the complaint himself. Only persons who are not parties to the action, and who are over the age of 18, are allowed to serve process. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. ("FRCP") 4(c).

Plaintiff must effectuate proper service of the summons and the complaint on defendant within 30 days from the date this order is filed, or the action will be dismissed, without further notice to plaintiff, for failure to prosecute under FRCP 41. If service has been properly effectuated, plaintiff shall file with this Court within 30 days of this order an affidavit attesting that service has been effected in compliance with FRCP 4. See FRCP 4(l).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RICHARD SEEBORG

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rosenbalm v. Foulk

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 11, 2011
No. C 10-0071 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Rosenbalm v. Foulk

Case Details

Full title:VINCENT LEE ROSENBALM, Plaintiff, v. EDWARD FOULK, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 11, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-0071 RS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2011)