From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosen v. Lipshitz

City Court of New York, New York County
Jun 7, 1933
149 Misc. 144 (N.Y. City Ct. 1933)

Opinion

June 7, 1933.

Cohen Brothers, for the judgment creditors.

Herman Levin, for the judgment debtor.


The facts, substantially undisputed, are as follows: Supplementary proceedings were instituted by the judgment creditors by the service of third party orders on two fire insurance companies on March 18, 1933, both of which waived any irregularities of service, each submitting an affidavit in lieu of appearance and examination. By those respective affidavits it appears that the judgment debtor has an agreed claim against one of said companies amounting to the sum of $266.29 and against the other for $238.75, aggregating $505, as a result of a fire loss sustained by the judgment debtor. The judgment creditors have thus acquired an equitable lien on said aggregate sum of $505 owing by said insurance companies to the judgment debtor, which on the appointment of a receiver would ripen into a legal title in such receiver as of March 18, 1933, the date of the service of said third party orders. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 810; McCorkle v. Herrman, 117 N.Y. 297, 305.) Subsequent to the service of said third party orders and on March 25, 1933, the judgment debtor made a general assignment for the benefit of all his creditors. That fact neither stays nor suspends the remedies of the judgment creditors. ( Matter of Rutaced Co., 137 A.D. 716.) Nor is the assignee such a bona fide purchaser without notice and for a valuable consideration as to defeat the legal title of a receiver when appointed. The motion must, therefore, be granted. Submit order.


Summaries of

Rosen v. Lipshitz

City Court of New York, New York County
Jun 7, 1933
149 Misc. 144 (N.Y. City Ct. 1933)
Case details for

Rosen v. Lipshitz

Case Details

Full title:JACOB ROSEN and Others, Doing Business as ROSEN BROS. PINCUS, Judgment…

Court:City Court of New York, New York County

Date published: Jun 7, 1933

Citations

149 Misc. 144 (N.Y. City Ct. 1933)
266 N.Y.S. 797

Citing Cases

Matter of City of New York

In Reynolds v. AEtna Life Ins. Co. ( 160 N.Y. 635, at p. 648), MARTIN, J., stated: "The provisions of the…

Lebowitz v. Bowery Savings Bank

" ( McCorkle v. Herrman, 117 N.Y. 297, at p. 305.) (See, also, Rosen v. Lipshitz, 149 Misc. 144; Matter of…