From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rosemin v. Farrow & Ball, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Feb 27, 2023
Civil Action 1:23-cv-00219-PAE (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:23-cv-00219-PAE

02-27-2023

JERRY ROSEMIN. Plaintiff v. FARROW & BALL, INC., SARA BROWNSTEIN, and MEGHAN FORT, Defendants.


ORDER TO TRANSFER VENUE

PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Upon consideration of Plaintiff Jerry Rosemin and Defendant Farrow & Ball, Inc.'s Proposed Consent Order to Transfer Venue, the Court hereby ORDERS:

1. The Proposed Consent Order to Transfer Venue is GRANTED;

2. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(3), this case could have been brought in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. In his Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to his claims, and the alleged unlawful employment practices, occurred in Washington D.C. at the Company's storefront in which Plaintiff was employed.

3. This action is hereby TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a).

4. Nothing in this Order, or the parties' Proposed Consent Order to Transfer Venue, shall be construed as a waiver of any legal or factual argument or position relating to this case.

5. All current deadlines are VACATED.

6. The Clerk of the Court is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia forthwith. Each party bears its own costs.


Summaries of

Rosemin v. Farrow & Ball, Inc.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Feb 27, 2023
Civil Action 1:23-cv-00219-PAE (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2023)
Case details for

Rosemin v. Farrow & Ball, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JERRY ROSEMIN. Plaintiff v. FARROW & BALL, INC., SARA BROWNSTEIN, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Feb 27, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 1:23-cv-00219-PAE (D.D.C. Feb. 27, 2023)