From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 25, 2016
SC: 151790 (Mich. Apr. 25, 2016)

Opinion

SC: 151790

04-25-2016

MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant, and MUKASH PATEL, DENNIS STOKES, and WILLIAM McPHERSON Defendants-Appellants.


Order

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice Stephen J. Markman Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Joan L. Larsen, Justices COA: 314650
Wayne CC: 11-011214-NO

By order of February 5, 2016, the parties were directed to file supplemental briefs addressing whether the plaintiffs' claims are barred by the exclusive remedy provision of the Worker's Disability Compensation Act (WDCA). On order of the Court, the supplemental briefs having been received, the application for leave to appeal the May 7, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals is again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for the court to consider whether it has subject matter jurisdiction to hear the plaintiffs' claims pursuant to MCL 418.131(1) and MCL 418.827(1).

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 25, 2016

/s/_________

Clerk


Summaries of

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 25, 2016
SC: 151790 (Mich. Apr. 25, 2016)
Case details for

Roseman v. City of Detroit

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. ROSEMAN and LUZATER ROSEMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 25, 2016

Citations

SC: 151790 (Mich. Apr. 25, 2016)