From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 5, 2024
2:22-cv-08155-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)

Opinion

2:22-cv-08155-DOC-SHK

02-05-2024

ANTHONY PHILLIP ROSE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER, United States District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the R&R to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition is DENIED and that Judgment be entered DISMISSING any claim Petitioner is raising based on the California Racial Justice Act (“CRJA”) without prejudice, and DISMISSING the remainder of this action with prejudice.


Summaries of

Rose v. Warden

United States District Court, Central District of California
Feb 5, 2024
2:22-cv-08155-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Rose v. Warden

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PHILLIP ROSE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Feb 5, 2024

Citations

2:22-cv-08155-DOC-SHK (C.D. Cal. Feb. 5, 2024)