From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2019
Case No. CV 16-09557 AG (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-09557 AG (SHK)

03-30-2019

CLEVELAND ZACHARY ROSE, Petitioner, v. JOHN SUTTON, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice. Dated: March 30, 2019

/s/_________

HONORABLE ANDREW J. GUILFORD

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rose v. Sutton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 30, 2019
Case No. CV 16-09557 AG (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2019)
Case details for

Rose v. Sutton

Case Details

Full title:CLEVELAND ZACHARY ROSE, Petitioner, v. JOHN SUTTON, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 30, 2019

Citations

Case No. CV 16-09557 AG (SHK) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 30, 2019)