From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Stokely

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 20, 2002
253 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. 241029.

Updated December 20, 2002.


ORDER ENTERED OCTOBER 29, 2002

Rose v Stokely, Docket No. 241029. The Court orders that a special panel shall be convened pursuant to MCR 7.215(I) to resolve the conflict between this case and Thompson v Merritt, 192 Mich. App. 412; 481 N.W.2d 735 (1991).

The Court further orders under MCR 7.215(I)(5) that the portion of the opinion concerning the conflict addressed in section III of the opinion released October 1, 2002, is vacated.

The appellant may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of the Clerk's certification of this order. Appellee may file a supplemental brief within 21 days of service of appellant's brief. Nine copies must be filed with the Clerk of the Court.

McDonald, J., did not participate.


Summaries of

Rose v. Stokely

Michigan Court of Appeals
Dec 20, 2002
253 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

Rose v. Stokely

Case Details

Full title:BILLIE MICHELLE ROSE, Plaintiff, and COUNTY OF CALHOUN, Appellant, v…

Court:Michigan Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 20, 2002

Citations

253 Mich. App. 801 (Mich. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Rose v, Stokely

This finding set in motion the conflict provisions of MCR 7.215(I)(2), now MCR 7.215(J)(2), and this conflict…

Rose v. Stokely

Submitted August 6, 2002, at Lansing. Decided October 1, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. Vacated in part by order entered…