From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Stirling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2024
No. 24-6556 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2024)

Opinion

24-6556

10-25-2024

JAMES R. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING, Director of Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee.

James Rose, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Submitted: October 22, 2024

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Robert Bryan Harwell, Senior District Judge. (0:23-cv-05261-RBH)

James Rose, Appellant Pro Se.

Before King and Wynn, Circuit Judges, and Traxler, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

James R. Rose appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing without prejudice Rose's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. Rose v. Stirling, No. 0:23-cv-05261-RBH (D.S.C. May 9, 2024). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Rose v. Stirling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 25, 2024
No. 24-6556 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Rose v. Stirling

Case Details

Full title:JAMES R. ROSE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRYAN STIRLING, Director of…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 25, 2024

Citations

No. 24-6556 (4th Cir. Oct. 25, 2024)