From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 25, 1975
308 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Opinion

No. U-392.

February 25, 1975.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County, Clifford B. Shepard, J.

Richard W. Ervin, III, Public Defender, and David J. Busch, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., and Carolyn M. Snurkowski, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.


Appellant seeks reversal of the Order revoking his probation and the judgment and sentence entered thereon, contending that there was insufficient evidence to support said order of revocation.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal, the transcript of the hearing and the briefs submitted by counsel. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that there was sufficient, competent evidence to support the decision of the trial judge that appellant had violated the conditions of his probation. Appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error in the proceedings below, the Order revoking probation and the judgment and sentence appealed herein are affirmed.

JOHNSON, Acting C.J., and BOYER and McCORD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rose v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 25, 1975
308 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)
Case details for

Rose v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES WESLEY ROSE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 25, 1975

Citations

308 So. 2d 119 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1975)

Citing Cases

James v. State

Therefore, we affirm the order of revocation of probation. Randolph v. State, 292 So.2d 374 (Fla. 3rd DCA…