Rose v. State

Full title: Uriah ROSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: May 30, 2012

89 So. 3d 1053 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 3D12–1078.

2012-05-30

Uriah ROSE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge. Uriah Rose, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Monroe County, Luis M. Garcia, Judge.
Uriah Rose, in proper person. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SUAREZ, ROTHENBERG and EMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Little v. State, 77 So.3d 722, 722–23 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (holding that “section 893.13, as amended by section 893.101, Florida Statutes (2002), is constitutional”; rejecting Shelton v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, 802 F.Supp.2d 1289, 1308 (M.D.Fla.2011), in which a federal court held that section 893.13, Florida Statutes (2004), “violates the due process clause and that the statute is unconstitutional on its face”); Ortega v. State, 76 So.3d 346 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); see also State v. Adkins, 71 So.3d 184 (Fla. 2d DCA 2011), review granted,71 So.3d 117 (Fla.2011).