From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1920
18 Okla. Crim. 708 (Okla. Crim. App. 1920)

Opinion

No. 3568.

Opinion Filed November 12, 1920.

Appeal from County Court, Atoka County; J.M. Humphreys, Judge.

B. Rose was convicted of a violation of the prohibitory liquor law and he appeals. Affirmed.

C. McCasland, for plaintiff in error.

The Attorney General and W.C. Hall, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error, B. Rose, was convicted on an information charging that he did have possession of intoxicating liquor with the intention of selling the same, and was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment an appeal was taken, by filing in this court on June 12, 1919, a duly certified transcript of the record proper. No brief has been filed, and no appearance made on behalf of plaintiff in error when the case was called for final submission.

The motion of the Attorney General to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal is therefore affirmed.


Summaries of

Rose v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Nov 12, 1920
18 Okla. Crim. 708 (Okla. Crim. App. 1920)
Case details for

Rose v. State

Case Details

Full title:B. ROSE v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Nov 12, 1920

Citations

18 Okla. Crim. 708 (Okla. Crim. App. 1920)
192 P. 1105

Citing Cases

State v. Reeves

In a trial before a judge without a jury, the proper method of preserving such an issue of law for appellate…

State v. Larson

Applying this rationale to the instant case, the defendant cites State v. Rose, 147 La. 243, 84 So. 643…