From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Standard Oil Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 6, 1936
188 A. 71 (R.I. 1936)

Opinion

November 6, 1936.

PRESENT: Flynn, C.J., Moss, Capotosto, Baker, and Condon, JJ.

Petition for reargument denied.

William A. Needham, Albert A. Baker, Baker Spicer, for petitioners.

Francis I. McCanna, Edward M. McEntee, Lee McCanna, for respondents.


After the filing of our opinion the Standard Oil Company of New York, Inc., and the Socony-Vacuum Corporation, by leave of court, filed a motion for a reargument of these cases. We have considered the motion and find that it does not set forth any sufficient reason or reasons why there should be a reargument of these cases.

The motion for a reargument is therefore denied and dismissed.


Summaries of

Rose v. Standard Oil Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Nov 6, 1936
188 A. 71 (R.I. 1936)
Case details for

Rose v. Standard Oil Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:MANUEL ROSE vs. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC. SAME vs…

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Nov 6, 1936

Citations

188 A. 71 (R.I. 1936)
188 A. 71

Citing Cases

Morgan v. Oil Co.

885, 55 S.W.2d 485; Boyle v. Neisner Bros., 230 Mo. App. 90, 87 S.W.2d 227; Jeffers v. Montana Power Co., 68…