From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rose v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1952
280 App. Div. 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)

Opinion

June 18, 1952.

Present — Peck P.J., Callahan, Van Voorhis, Heffernan and Bergan, JJ. [See post, p. 864.]


Appeal No. 1: Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Appeal No. 2: Order unanimously modified so as to allow the taking of the deposition of Humes by written interrogatories, limited to the showing of the documentary records of the Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. Co. and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. Appeal No. 3: Order unanimously affirmed. No opinion. Settle order on notice. Appeal No. 4: Order unanimously modified so as to provide for the examination of each of the witnesses involved in this order upon written interrogatories; the testimony of the witnesses Wilson and Hopper to be limited to testimony with respect to official records. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Rose v. Rose

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 18, 1952
280 App. Div. 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)
Case details for

Rose v. Rose

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR H. ROSE, Respondent, v. BILLY ROSE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 18, 1952

Citations

280 App. Div. 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1952)